Ghana / Burkina faso +233245024002, +22662030109

Menu

The Pros & Cons of Upfront Fees vs. Revenue Sharing for Music Distribution

K Steez

After pushing your newest song past the finish line, it’s time for strategic action.

Unleashing your latest and greatest onto the masses takes a release partner, and selecting the right one requires research.

Right off the bat, you might notice a major difference in fee structure among digital distributors. Some require a flat, upfront fee to upload and distribute music, while others “share in revenue,” meaning they take a percentage of the income your music generates via their service.

Making the choice between the two is something artists and teams should consider carefully. Though an upfront-fee-based model seems straightforward and predictable (you know how much you’re paying and for what), a revenue share model incentivizes partnership and often provides an opportunity to unlock additional support down the line.

At the early stage of a career. The choice you make may not have huge consequences. It’s when things grow that the rev share model really takes over with artists needing more support, advances, marketing, and services.”

The appeal of an upfront fee is no mystery; Artists typically retain all revenue once they pay a preset amount at the start. After an artist pays that fee and the distributor delivers your work to streaming services, that’s usually where that partner’s obligation ends.

If you’re solely looking for a provider to deliver your music and cover the basics, this model makes sense. Costs start to accumulate, however, once you start to require ancillary servicing—preorders, instant grats, pre-saves, Content ID, UPC and ISRC assignments, etc.

 Michael Bamfo CEO & Founder Apprise Music
Michael Bamfo; CEO & Founder Apprise Music

Conversely, other music companies, Apprise Music included, receive a percentage cut of an artist’s revenues when those creators find success. As Michael Bamfo, President of Apprise Music, puts it, “If our artist makes nothing, we make nothing.” The incentive structure encourages true partnership and support based on aligned interests that lead to additional services, powerful tech tools, etc.

That relationship intrinsically drives mutually beneficial growth.

“It doesn’t make any sense to take an artist on a revenue share and then not try your hardest to make sure [their music] gets streamed, downloaded, and sold as much as possible.

Apprise Music is built to simplify distribution and then provide additional tools, teams and services when it comes time for artists to look beyond digital content delivery. In other words, we’re here to pay attention and amplify traction wherever possible.

We’re helping develop artists that can grow, Therefore, our business will flourish if the artist flourishes. It keeps us motivated to build and enhance the way we work with partners because the more opportunities we get for our artists, the more royalties they are going to be seeing. We’re not making money unless that’s happening for them.”

If you’re struggling to select one model over the other, one or two key questions might illuminate answers. “Will the partner add more value than their commission rate? If so, then clearly you make more money with that partner.”

Less tangible yet crucial to consider is perception’s role in DSP support. Some streaming services pay mind to who an artist associates with when making editorial decisions. The vetted roster of a company like Apprise Music, with clients selected based on present quality and future potential, creates trust with the Spotifys and Apple Musics of the world.

If, at the end of the day, the choice between fee structures is purely based on financial reasoning, consider what you’ll lose by not sharing in revenue versus what you might potentially gain from an upfront-fee deal. In many cases, the revenue you share with your distribution partner may be more than outweighed by the value of the services you’re receiving in exchange for a percentage.

“We have built our service to exceed our cut of the revenues and increase net profits for our artist clients, Whether it’s the tools, the educational materials or the playlist promotion proposition, we feel that will end up impacting revenues more than our 15 percent share of their [income].”

Ultimately, the decision comes down to finding and defining value. Doing so through the lens of short-term gains versus long-term investments helps clarify which distribution model benefits your business and your art best.

Credit; Michael Bamfo

 

Related articles

RAS CALEB APPIAH-LEVI

Nation Peace Song by Musiga Greater Accra

Nation Peace Song by Musiga Greater Accra Featuring; Ras Appiah Levi, Adam, Gifty Osei, kento, AutentiQ, Perppy, Assanqoma, De Servant, Young Money, Joe Wizzy, Anumaa, […]

Learn More
Réveillez vous by Moa Dadiss by VOTING in support of MOA DADISS as his is nominated at MARLEY DOR 2019 # in # REVELATION #

Moa Dadiss Wins nomination at MARLEY DOR 2019

After his press conference for the official release of the Album entitled Réveillez vous by Moa Dadiss which was well patronized by his friends, family […]

Learn More
Moa Dadiss appelle à une révolution mentale avec son premier album; Réveillez-vous

Moa Dadiss appelle à une révolution mentale avec son premier album; Réveillez-vous

Originaire de Batié DAH Disse de son vrai nom est né d’une famille Birifor. Il s’attache depuis sa tendre enfance à la musique traditionnelle (musique […]

Learn More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *